A comparative analysis of human and automatic query variants

Binsheng Liu, Nick Craswell, Xiaolu Lu, Oren Kurland, J. Shane Culpepper

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

Abstract

We present an in-depth comparative analysis of the effectiveness distributions of sets of human-created and automatically-created query variations used to represent the same information need. The automatic variations are generated using Bing's click graph. Experiments performed with TREC datasets show that using automatic variations for retrieval can result in similar effectiveness to that of using human variations, although the two types of variations can be appreciably di?erent in several important respects - e.g., their similarities and corresponding retrieved lists.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationICTIR 2019 - Proceedings of the 2019 ACM SIGIR International Conference on Theory of Information Retrieval
Pages47-50
Number of pages4
ISBN (Electronic)9781450368810
DOIs
StatePublished - 23 Sep 2019
Event9th ACM SIGIR International Conference on the Theory of Information Retrieval, ICTIR 2019 - Santa Clara, United States
Duration: 2 Oct 20195 Oct 2019

Publication series

NameICTIR 2019 - Proceedings of the 2019 ACM SIGIR International Conference on Theory of Information Retrieval

Conference

Conference9th ACM SIGIR International Conference on the Theory of Information Retrieval, ICTIR 2019
Country/TerritoryUnited States
CitySanta Clara
Period2/10/195/10/19

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Computer Science (miscellaneous)
  • Information Systems

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A comparative analysis of human and automatic query variants'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this