TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparing concurrent and sequential practices in cloud-BIM interdisciplinary collaborative design
T2 - an experimental study
AU - Chen, Siyu
AU - Lau, Anthony
AU - Yeung, Timson
AU - Nyberg, Kim
AU - Sacks, Rafael
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - Effective interdisciplinary collaboration is crucial for success in building design, yet current sequential practices often hamper collaboration and lead to suboptimal outcomes. This study examines interdisciplinary collaboration during the detailed design phase within a Cloud-based Building Information Modeling (Cloud-based BIM) environment, aiming to identify effective practices and offer improvement recommendations. Following two initial experiments to refine the settings, five experiments involving architects, structural, and Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing (MEP) designers compared concurrent and sequential collaborative design practices in terms of project efficiency, quality, and team dynamics. Results show that concurrent practices enable earlier issue identification, greater interaction, and faster resolution, but also lead to more clashes due to increased issue discovery. Problem identification, solution development, and execution behaviors are key contributors to the effectiveness of concurrent design. The study suggests that Cloud-based BIM platforms with real-time communication can support concurrent workflow and collaborative behaviors, improving design efficiency and quality. These findings may extend to other interdisciplinary design environments reliant on collaborative workflows.
AB - Effective interdisciplinary collaboration is crucial for success in building design, yet current sequential practices often hamper collaboration and lead to suboptimal outcomes. This study examines interdisciplinary collaboration during the detailed design phase within a Cloud-based Building Information Modeling (Cloud-based BIM) environment, aiming to identify effective practices and offer improvement recommendations. Following two initial experiments to refine the settings, five experiments involving architects, structural, and Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing (MEP) designers compared concurrent and sequential collaborative design practices in terms of project efficiency, quality, and team dynamics. Results show that concurrent practices enable earlier issue identification, greater interaction, and faster resolution, but also lead to more clashes due to increased issue discovery. Problem identification, solution development, and execution behaviors are key contributors to the effectiveness of concurrent design. The study suggests that Cloud-based BIM platforms with real-time communication can support concurrent workflow and collaborative behaviors, improving design efficiency and quality. These findings may extend to other interdisciplinary design environments reliant on collaborative workflows.
KW - Building Information Modeling (BIM)
KW - collaborative design
KW - concurrent collaboration
KW - interdisciplinary design collaboration
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105015153477
U2 - 10.1080/17452007.2025.2549493
DO - 10.1080/17452007.2025.2549493
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:105015153477
SN - 1745-2007
JO - Architectural Engineering and Design Management
JF - Architectural Engineering and Design Management
ER -