TY - JOUR
T1 - Don't throw away your printed books
T2 - A meta-analysis on the effects of reading media on reading comprehension
AU - Delgado, Pablo
AU - Vargas, Cristina
AU - Ackerman, Rakefet
AU - Salmerón, Ladislao
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 The Authors
PY - 2018/11
Y1 - 2018/11
N2 - With the increasing dominance of digital reading over paper reading, gaining understanding of the effects of the medium on reading comprehension has become critical. However, results from research comparing learning outcomes across printed and digital media are mixed, making conclusions difficult to reach. In the current meta-analysis, we examined research in recent years (2000–2017), comparing the reading of comparable texts on paper and on digital devices. We included studies with between-participants (n = 38) and within-participants designs (n = 16) involving 171,055 participants. Both designs yielded the same advantage of paper over digital reading (Hedge's g = −0.21; dc = −0.21). Analyses revealed three significant moderators: (1) time frame: the paper-based reading advantage increased in time-constrained reading compared to self-paced reading; (2) text genre: the paper-based reading advantage was consistent across studies using informational texts, or a mix of informational and narrative texts, but not on those using only narrative texts; (3) publication year: the advantage of paper-based reading increased over the years. Theoretical and educational implications are discussed.
AB - With the increasing dominance of digital reading over paper reading, gaining understanding of the effects of the medium on reading comprehension has become critical. However, results from research comparing learning outcomes across printed and digital media are mixed, making conclusions difficult to reach. In the current meta-analysis, we examined research in recent years (2000–2017), comparing the reading of comparable texts on paper and on digital devices. We included studies with between-participants (n = 38) and within-participants designs (n = 16) involving 171,055 participants. Both designs yielded the same advantage of paper over digital reading (Hedge's g = −0.21; dc = −0.21). Analyses revealed three significant moderators: (1) time frame: the paper-based reading advantage increased in time-constrained reading compared to self-paced reading; (2) text genre: the paper-based reading advantage was consistent across studies using informational texts, or a mix of informational and narrative texts, but not on those using only narrative texts; (3) publication year: the advantage of paper-based reading increased over the years. Theoretical and educational implications are discussed.
KW - Digital-based reading
KW - Meta-analysis
KW - Paper-based reading
KW - Reading comprehension
KW - Reading media differences
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85053845947&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.edurev.2018.09.003
DO - 10.1016/j.edurev.2018.09.003
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.systematicreview???
AN - SCOPUS:85053845947
SN - 1747-938X
VL - 25
SP - 23
EP - 38
JO - Educational Research Review
JF - Educational Research Review
ER -