TY - JOUR
T1 - Evaluation of Intravitreal Kenalog Toxicity in Humans
AU - Lang, Yaron
AU - Leibu, Rina
AU - Shoham, Nir
AU - Miller, Benjamin
AU - Perlman, Ido
PY - 2007/4
Y1 - 2007/4
N2 - Objective: To evaluate possible functional toxicity of intravitreal Kenalog (commercial triamcinolone acetonide) in patients' retinas. Design: Observational case series. Participants: Thirty-two phakic eyes of 16 patients who had nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy and bilateral macular edema refractory to laser therapy, which had no other eye disorder and no previous ophthalmic operation. Intervention: Kenalog (4 mg/0.1 ml) was injected intravitreally to one eye, whereas the second eye served as the control. The experimental eye was chosen as the eye with worse visual acuity (VA). Main Outcome Measures: Deterioration of electroretinogram parameters of the study eye measured at 3 months of follow-up when compared with the electroretinogram responses of the fellow, control eye and when compared with electroretinogram responses obtained before injection. Visual acuity, intraocular pressure (IOP), and eventual complications were assessed. No improvement or deterioration of VA or any increase in IOP was regarded as a secondary outcome. Results: Average maximal response amplitude ratios of the dark-adapted b-wave (treated/control eyes) of the electroretinogram were 0.93 before (P = 0.221) and 0.94 (P = 0.387) 3 months after Kenalog injection. Average ratios of the light-adapted b-wave amplitude (treated/control eyes) of the electroretinogram were 1.04 (P = 0.702) before and 0.86 (P = 0.138) 3 months after Kenalog injection. No significant differences (P>0.05) were found between the electroretinogram parameters obtained from all eyes before and 3 months after Kenalog injection. Average VAs in the treated eyes were 1.08, 0.8, and 1.0 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution units before and 2 and 4 months after injection, respectively. Temporary elevation of IOP was found in 4 treated eyes of 4 patients (25%). Conclusions: No electroretinographic evidence of a retinotoxic effect of intravitreal Kenalog was found in our patients.
AB - Objective: To evaluate possible functional toxicity of intravitreal Kenalog (commercial triamcinolone acetonide) in patients' retinas. Design: Observational case series. Participants: Thirty-two phakic eyes of 16 patients who had nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy and bilateral macular edema refractory to laser therapy, which had no other eye disorder and no previous ophthalmic operation. Intervention: Kenalog (4 mg/0.1 ml) was injected intravitreally to one eye, whereas the second eye served as the control. The experimental eye was chosen as the eye with worse visual acuity (VA). Main Outcome Measures: Deterioration of electroretinogram parameters of the study eye measured at 3 months of follow-up when compared with the electroretinogram responses of the fellow, control eye and when compared with electroretinogram responses obtained before injection. Visual acuity, intraocular pressure (IOP), and eventual complications were assessed. No improvement or deterioration of VA or any increase in IOP was regarded as a secondary outcome. Results: Average maximal response amplitude ratios of the dark-adapted b-wave (treated/control eyes) of the electroretinogram were 0.93 before (P = 0.221) and 0.94 (P = 0.387) 3 months after Kenalog injection. Average ratios of the light-adapted b-wave amplitude (treated/control eyes) of the electroretinogram were 1.04 (P = 0.702) before and 0.86 (P = 0.138) 3 months after Kenalog injection. No significant differences (P>0.05) were found between the electroretinogram parameters obtained from all eyes before and 3 months after Kenalog injection. Average VAs in the treated eyes were 1.08, 0.8, and 1.0 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution units before and 2 and 4 months after injection, respectively. Temporary elevation of IOP was found in 4 treated eyes of 4 patients (25%). Conclusions: No electroretinographic evidence of a retinotoxic effect of intravitreal Kenalog was found in our patients.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33947602026&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.08.044
DO - 10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.08.044
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 17224183
AN - SCOPUS:33947602026
SN - 0161-6420
VL - 114
SP - 724
EP - 731
JO - Ophthalmology
JF - Ophthalmology
IS - 4
ER -