Observability challenges in sparse estimation of fault events

Igal Rozenberg, Yoash Levron

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

Abstract

Sparse state estimation methods enable the location of network events using limited data. For instance, recent works use sparse recovery techniques to locate various faults with a small number of measurements. This paper addresses the question of sparse state estimation observability. A well-known result is that observability may be determined using the sensing matrix spark. This paper shows that sparse events can be uniquely located even when the spark uniqueness condition is not met. This result stems from the specific structure of sparse events, which imposes additional constraints on the non-zero entries of the sparse vectors. Analytic conditions are derived for the observability of a single short to ground. These conditions are shown to be both sufficient and necessary. The observability criterion is demonstrated on the IEEE 30 system. It is shown that for this system, five sensors are sufficient to uniquely locate any single short-to-ground.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publication2016 IEEE International Energy Conference, ENERGYCON 2016
ISBN (Electronic)9781467384636
DOIs
StatePublished - 14 Jul 2016
Event2016 IEEE International Energy Conference, ENERGYCON 2016 - Leuven, Belgium
Duration: 4 Apr 20168 Apr 2016

Publication series

Name2016 IEEE International Energy Conference, ENERGYCON 2016

Conference

Conference2016 IEEE International Energy Conference, ENERGYCON 2016
Country/TerritoryBelgium
CityLeuven
Period4/04/168/04/16

Keywords

  • Compressed sensing
  • Event detection
  • Observability
  • Sparse State Estimation
  • State estimation
  • Wide area networks

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Computer Networks and Communications
  • Energy Engineering and Power Technology
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Observability challenges in sparse estimation of fault events'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this