TY - JOUR
T1 - Semantic memory and creativity
T2 - the costs and benefits of semantic memory structure in generating original ideas
AU - Beaty, Roger E.
AU - Kenett, Yoed N.
AU - Hass, Richard W.
AU - Schacter, Daniel L.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - Despite its theoretical importance, little is known about how semantic memory structure facilitates and constrains creative idea generation. We examine whether the semantic richness of a concept has both benefits and costs to creative idea generation. Specifically, we tested whether cue set size—an index of semantic richness reflecting the average number of elements associated with a given concept—impacts the quantity (fluency) and quality (originality) of responses generated during the Alternate Uses Task (AUT). Across four studies, we show that low-association, sparse, AUT cues benefit originality at the cost of fluency compared to high-association, rich, AUT cues. Furthermore, we found an interaction with individual differences in fluid intelligence in the low-association AUT cues, suggesting that constraints of sparse semantic knowledge can be overcome with top-down intervention. Our findings indicate that semantic richness differentially impacts the quality and quantity of generated ideas, and that cognitive control processes can facilitate idea production when conceptual knowledge is limited.
AB - Despite its theoretical importance, little is known about how semantic memory structure facilitates and constrains creative idea generation. We examine whether the semantic richness of a concept has both benefits and costs to creative idea generation. Specifically, we tested whether cue set size—an index of semantic richness reflecting the average number of elements associated with a given concept—impacts the quantity (fluency) and quality (originality) of responses generated during the Alternate Uses Task (AUT). Across four studies, we show that low-association, sparse, AUT cues benefit originality at the cost of fluency compared to high-association, rich, AUT cues. Furthermore, we found an interaction with individual differences in fluid intelligence in the low-association AUT cues, suggesting that constraints of sparse semantic knowledge can be overcome with top-down intervention. Our findings indicate that semantic richness differentially impacts the quality and quantity of generated ideas, and that cognitive control processes can facilitate idea production when conceptual knowledge is limited.
KW - Creativity
KW - Cue set size
KW - divergent thinking
KW - fluid intelligence
KW - semantic memory
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85131001940&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/13546783.2022.2076742
DO - 10.1080/13546783.2022.2076742
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:85131001940
SN - 1354-6783
VL - 29
SP - 305
EP - 339
JO - Thinking and Reasoning
JF - Thinking and Reasoning
IS - 2
ER -