TY - JOUR

T1 - Sequential voting with confirmation network

AU - Babichenko, Yakov

AU - Dean, Oren

AU - Tennenholtz, Moshe

N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Y. Babichenko, O. Dean & M. Tennenholtz.

PY - 2019/7/19

Y1 - 2019/7/19

N2 - We discuss voting scenarios in which the set of voters (agents) and the set of alternatives are the same; that is, voters select a single representative from among themselves. Such a scenario happens, for instance, when a committee selects a chairperson, or when peer researchers select a prize winner. Our model assumes that each voter either renders worthy (confirms) or unworthy any other agent. We further assume that the prime goal of each agent is to be selected himself. Only if that is not feasible, will he try to get one of those that he confirms selected. In this paper, we investigate the open-sequential voting system in the above model. We consider both plurality (where each voter has one vote) and approval (where a voter may vote for any subset). Our results show that it is possible to find scenarios in which the selected agent is much less popular than the optimal (most popular) agent. We prove, however, that in the case of approval voting, the ratio between their popularity is always bounded from above by 2. In the case of plurality voting, we show that there are cases in which some of the equilibria give an unbounded ratio, but there always exists at least one equilibrium with ratio 2 at most.

AB - We discuss voting scenarios in which the set of voters (agents) and the set of alternatives are the same; that is, voters select a single representative from among themselves. Such a scenario happens, for instance, when a committee selects a chairperson, or when peer researchers select a prize winner. Our model assumes that each voter either renders worthy (confirms) or unworthy any other agent. We further assume that the prime goal of each agent is to be selected himself. Only if that is not feasible, will he try to get one of those that he confirms selected. In this paper, we investigate the open-sequential voting system in the above model. We consider both plurality (where each voter has one vote) and approval (where a voter may vote for any subset). Our results show that it is possible to find scenarios in which the selected agent is much less popular than the optimal (most popular) agent. We prove, however, that in the case of approval voting, the ratio between their popularity is always bounded from above by 2. In the case of plurality voting, we show that there are cases in which some of the equilibria give an unbounded ratio, but there always exists at least one equilibrium with ratio 2 at most.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85072210224&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4204/EPTCS.297.2

DO - 10.4204/EPTCS.297.2

M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.conferencearticle???

AN - SCOPUS:85072210224

SN - 2075-2180

VL - 297

SP - 19

EP - 34

JO - Electronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science, EPTCS

JF - Electronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science, EPTCS

T2 - 17th Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2019

Y2 - 17 July 2019 through 19 July 2019

ER -